1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
|
Letter to Dave: On the Death of the Church and the idol of success
##################################################################
:date: 2021-09-13T13:53:48
:category: faith
:tags: theology, christianity, culture,
(`Dave Schmelzer`_ asked in his monthly letter for thoughts on
the situation of the Church in America, so I have replied)
So, if you're game, I'd love to ask your thoughts on two
things. Do you believe that something has fundamentally gone
wrong with the American church? (I'm in forums that do.) If
so, tell me more about what that is. And do you perhaps have
any thoughts about what the solution might be? That said, if
you disagree and you by no means believe that the American
church has gone off track, I'd love any thoughts you have on
that as well.
If you live elsewhere than America, please forgive the
provincialism of my question! But then do help me overcome
that provincialism by suggesting a question or two that you'd
like to see addressed! And if you have thoughts on which
fascinating person you'd like to hear discuss this current
question on air with me, I'm all ears.
Hello, Dave,
I don’t think it is provincial to care for your own nation (is
“provincial” as an adjective a word?), don’t be ashamed of that.
I could talk with you about this for hours, because I was
thinking about similar themes lately a lot, but let me add you
just couple of points:
* Dying church. Jesus Christ promised us only that the Church as
whole will not be prevailed by the Gates of Hell (whatever it
is), he certainly never promised that each national or local
church will live forever. And certainly there are many
particular parts of the Church which are gone: the mighty
Church of North Africa, once a home of the greatest theologians
like Tertullian, Lactantius, Cyprian, and of course St.
Augustin, is gone (mostly), whole gigantic Church of East (see
https://amzn.com/0061472816 or https://amzn.com/B000ZOMDVU)
died its final breath (I am afraid) during our lifetime. The
Church in Europe is certainly not dead, I see life wherever
I look, but even I can admit that its vitality has been greatly
diminished during the last two hundred years or so. Otto Mádr,
one of the greatest teachers of the Czech church in the
twentieth century (spent fifteen years in the Communist lagers
and his releasing documents concluded that “the purpose of his
corrective time was completely missed: the prisoner leaves the
institution same as he came”, and it was so), wrote a short
essay on this topic in 1976 (probably the second darkest time
during the Communist era) which I have translated into
English_.
* On the similar note, while living in the European Church with
greatly diminished vitality, I was thinking a lot about this
question: “What we did wrong?” Specifically, what we Europeans
did so wrong, that we have our Church in the state it is? There
are many many possible answers and NONE of them persuades me as
the plausible one. There are many affirmative answers (yes, we
did something wrong which caused all this): too much following
modernism/industrial revolution (aka theological liberalism),
insufficient following modernism/industrial revolution (aka
Biblical fundamentalism), following Jeremy Bentham and
utilitarianism (one of my favourite causes of all suffering in
the current world), and many many others.
However, I am currently more fascinated (although not fully
persuaded) by the possibility of the negative answer. No, we
didn't do anything wrong, there are just waves of the level of
religiosity in history. Sometime it is up (Middle Ages, Baroque
in Europe), sometime it is down (Renaissance, Ancient Rome), and
Christians role is just to live well in whatever situation they
found themselves in (“All we have to decide is what to do with
the time that is given us.”). Yes, it doesn’t sound completely
convincing even to me, it is either a cheap excuse (“not our
fault”) or those external impersonal forces changing the history
look too much like something demonic, but still there seems to me
a lot which makes this interesting.
* On the other hand, does finding the root cause of all our
problems really matter at all? Whatever causes were of the
death of the Church in Europe (or upcoming death of the Church
in the Northern America) they are wast, complicated, and
probably way above anything this little ol’ me can influence.
I was preaching two guest sermons during the summer. One (in
Czech) was exactly about this, Death of the Church, and other
(in English, in our congregation) was about the similar fun
theme, the last judgement of believers (1st Corinthians
3:10-15). I won’t certainly repeat everything from the latter
one, just one thing: one of the biggest idols we Christians of
the current time worship, I believe, is *a success*.
It seems to be rooted in very complicated idea of meritocracy
(see https://amzn.com/0375420835 on the related concept of the
status anxiety). Democratic society of the last roughly two
hundred years tried to overcome previous class-based structure,
where the status was mostly based on your ancestors. They
promised new world, where everybody would get everybody what
they deserve. I agree that it is much improvement over the
previous system, but it has its very very dark side. The sad
part of life is that a huge part of every society of every era
are people who are unhappy with their life, who feel rightly or
wrongly as a failure (and our pop culture doesn’t help, see
also your Trump voters and our equivalents of the same on this
side of The Pond). Those people got in the feudal aristocratic
society a message, that their poor position in life is the
result of their ancestors and there is not much to be done
about it. Many even lower class communities developed their own
level of honour and pride (see British working-class pride who
are offended when called gentlemen or ladies). The message in
the meritocratic society (and let's ignore for a moment, how
the playing field is truly equal and how much reward truly
corresponds with the achievements) is quite dark: whatever
position in life you've achieved is what you deserved. If you
are on the bottom of the society it is because you are worse
person than people on the top. Material and financial success
became the measure of the quality of one's human life.
However, when you look at the New Testament, I don't see
success as the measure of quality of one's life. It seems to me
that much more important is **faithfulness**. The Lord doesn't
ask us to be successful, he asks to be faithful. And that
applies even to our success as the Church. Does it really
matter that much whether we are successful in our spreading of
the gospel, or whether we are faithful with bringing the good
news to our neighbours?
So, that's just few thoughts on your question.
Blessings,
Matěj
.. _English:
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/cizi/modus-moriendi_EN.html
.. _`Dave Schmelzer`:
https://journey-on.net
|
