diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst b/faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst index 0ebe5c2..071b8b7 100644 --- a/faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst +++ b/faith/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen.rst @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ Salmon fishing in the Yemen Most films are just faint shadows of what the original book was, but in case of “Salmon fishing in the Yemen“ it is more true than -it is convenient. My story with this story started by reading -`the review by Roger Ebert`_. I left the reading of the film -with a mixed feelings. On the one hand obviously Roger pointed -out flaws which were real. On the other hand, comments on the -review are firestorm of criticism explaining that Roger -completely missed the point of the film, and he is also -factually mistaken in couple of points. +it is convenient. My story with this story started by reading +`the review by Roger Ebert`_. I left the reading of the review +with a mixed feelings. On the one hand obviously Roger pointed +out flaws which were real. On the other hand, comments on the +review are firestorm of criticism explaining that Roger +completely missed the point of the film, and he is also factually +mistaken in couple of points. In the end I was so intrigued by the review and its comments, that I have watched it myself. I liked both main actors (Emily |