summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst')
-rw-r--r--_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst8
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst b/_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst
index cba45ba..344ec59 100644
--- a/_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst
+++ b/_drafts/sharks-jellyfish-bad-news.rst
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ linked `position paper of Vineyard USA on LGBT issues`_.
First completely nonsensical nitpick: as far as I know (and I may be
wrong, but if I recall correctly, I read in some book by Philipe
Cousteau) sharks have to swim because they don’t have operculum so they
-have to make water flow through their gills, otherwise they suffocate_
-. Not that it would matter that much for Dave’s argument.
+have to make water flow through their gills, otherwise they suffocate_ .
+Not that it would matter that much for Dave’s argument.
.. _suffocate:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090820085118AAaL3jP
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ set, but it seems to me he still misses the point. What should I say to
my homosexual friend (or for me more likely to some strong supporter of
gay rights, I don’t know much anybody who would be openly homosexual)?
And what to do with 1.Timothy 1:10 or 1.Corinthians 6:9f? If
+
+One of the most important things which helped me to understand my attitude
+towards homosexuality was proper understaning of what the sin is.
+
I understand the centered set thinking correctly, than obvious
interdicts in the Bible should not be understood as zaps (and even less
used as such to zap others), but as an advice why following the banned