diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | computer/vim-acme-design.rst | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | faith/greek_church_orthodoxy.rst | 17 |
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/computer/vim-acme-design.rst b/computer/vim-acme-design.rst index cbe4872..65f7697 100644 --- a/computer/vim-acme-design.rst +++ b/computer/vim-acme-design.rst @@ -240,19 +240,19 @@ mode (although probably just in its “normal” not in the inserting one?), but it would be interesting if we could run an action on selection/current word in the terminal. -Acme apparently follows the `@zawinski:2003zawinski` (“Every -program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs -which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.”) written -with these tools and small help tools. However, I think that is -a wrong idea. I think the main point of vim (and vi) is to be -extensible editor, not Emacs. However, the point is that -apparently idea of plumbing in Acme meant, that there should be -no internal scripting language for it, just external tools with -plumbing to stich all these together. Advantage being obviously -independence on particular language (I do agree, that support for -six independent programming languages in one editor is too much). -Those external tools are however often very focused on being used -only inside of Acme, so they should be kept separate from normal +Acme apparently follows the `@zawinski:2003zawinski` (“Every +program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs +which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.”) written +with these tools and small help tools. However, I think that is +a wrong idea for vim. I think the main point of vim (and vi) is +to be extensible editor, not Emacs. However, the point is that +apparently idea of plumbing in Acme meant, that there should be +no internal scripting language for it, just external tools with +plumbing to stich all these together. Advantage being obviously +independence on particular language (I do agree, that support for +six independent programming languages in one editor is too much). +Those external tools are however often very focused on being used +only inside of Acme, so they should be kept separate from normal system utilities (all of them are located outside of ``$PATH``). Another idea, which seemed to me surprising and interesting @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ reference as either target of the external browser (e.g., something like `xman(1)`_) or a small script defining means of conversion of the external source into something which vim can interpret natively. There are also heroic efforts to use -``dict://`` protocol, translation dictionaries, I use ver weird +``dict://`` protocol, translation dictionaries, I use very weird connector for Zotero_ while writing this article, and other data sources in vim and everything seems quite hackish and unstable. Some better approach is needed, in my opinion. In the case of diff --git a/faith/greek_church_orthodoxy.rst b/faith/greek_church_orthodoxy.rst index 3ec0e5e..5685ca5 100644 --- a/faith/greek_church_orthodoxy.rst +++ b/faith/greek_church_orthodoxy.rst @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ There seems to be now an emerging agreement from many sides that the extreme stress on the theological unity was crippling the Church in the war of the fifth and sixth century, but also that the exact minutiae of this fight are now mostly irrelevant -:xcite:`[@JenkinsJesusWars2011]`. This idea was (kind of -surprisingly) partially supported by -:xcite:`@cantalamessa:2015serving`: +:xcite:`[@JenkinsJesusWars2011]`. This criticism of excessive +stress on past theological issues was (kind of surprisingly) +partially supported by :xcite:`@cantalamessa:2015serving`: The situation in the beginning of the third millennium is not same as the one in the beginning of the second millennium, @@ -79,11 +79,12 @@ That is not to say that I consider these discussions to be useless, or that I would like to doubt the Trinitarianism. I believe that the Trinitarianism and the ability to maintain (more or less successfully) balance between the two Natures of Christ -are two most important distinctions between the Christianity as a -religion and other religions of the world. So, I don’t think -the theology is the problem, but the too high stress on the +are two most important distinctions between the Christianity as +a religion and other religions of the world. I mean, I don’t +think the theology is the problem, but too high stress on the correct theology as a qualification for the membership in the -Church or even for the salvation itself. +Church or even for the salvation itself could discourage people +from faith. My claiming that the current Church puts too much stress on the Greek inheritance may seem too theoretical and abstract. Let me @@ -92,7 +93,7 @@ around :xcite:`[@RatzingerFaith2006]`. [#]_ It is obvious that this speech was completely misunderstood equally both by the Moslem religious fanatics and secular journalists. While everybody was excited about the citation taken out of context, we -missed what the whole speach was all about. I more or less agree +missed what the whole speech was all about. I more or less agree with :xcite:`[@Jenkins2009]` that “Benedict insisted that authentic Christianity had to be based on the Greek philosophical tradition, establishing the European intellectual model as the |