summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/research/process.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu>2016-12-29 23:58:00 +0100
committerMatěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu>2016-12-29 23:58:00 +0100
commit21077dc8c003fd39203d1ba3e552af0e5170df73 (patch)
tree663808e48c65c7f3ab3aa667aba48c5daaffb174 /research/process.rst
parent63cf41b39e3bfd547943a577b25124f886717ccd (diff)
downloadblog-source-21077dc8c003fd39203d1ba3e552af0e5170df73.tar.gz
Reorganize categories into subdirectories
Diffstat (limited to 'research/process.rst')
-rw-r--r--research/process.rst24
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/research/process.rst b/research/process.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9e0337
--- /dev/null
+++ b/research/process.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Process
+#######
+
+:date: 2005-06-22T21:32:00
+:category: research
+:tags: dissertation, BostonMiracle
+
+The issue of analyzing for process (`Strauss, Corbin`_, chap. 11) brings
+another view on whole story of the Boston miracle. What kind of process
+are we actually observing? What is routine, what is a reaction to
+unexpected and what is emerging from the process?
+
+How does the changing image (from scary & dangerous city to community &
+cooperation with satisfaction & glorification) influences the process?
+
+One thing is obvious—when I have turned to newspapers and image
+analysis, I have also shifted from pure criminology towards something
+which has in itself a lot of political science. Are there any lessons
+about image-driven behavior already developed in the political science
+which can be brought to criminology and to the theory of reintegrative
+shaming & co.?
+
+.. _`Strauss, Corbin`:
+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-8039-5939-7