diff options
author | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2016-12-29 23:58:00 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2016-12-29 23:58:00 +0100 |
commit | 21077dc8c003fd39203d1ba3e552af0e5170df73 (patch) | |
tree | 663808e48c65c7f3ab3aa667aba48c5daaffb174 /research/process.rst | |
parent | 63cf41b39e3bfd547943a577b25124f886717ccd (diff) | |
download | blog-source-21077dc8c003fd39203d1ba3e552af0e5170df73.tar.gz |
Reorganize categories into subdirectories
Diffstat (limited to 'research/process.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | research/process.rst | 24 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/research/process.rst b/research/process.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e9e0337 --- /dev/null +++ b/research/process.rst @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +Process +####### + +:date: 2005-06-22T21:32:00 +:category: research +:tags: dissertation, BostonMiracle + +The issue of analyzing for process (`Strauss, Corbin`_, chap. 11) brings +another view on whole story of the Boston miracle. What kind of process +are we actually observing? What is routine, what is a reaction to +unexpected and what is emerging from the process? + +How does the changing image (from scary & dangerous city to community & +cooperation with satisfaction & glorification) influences the process? + +One thing is obvious—when I have turned to newspapers and image +analysis, I have also shifted from pure criminology towards something +which has in itself a lot of political science. Are there any lessons +about image-driven behavior already developed in the political science +which can be brought to criminology and to the theory of reintegrative +shaming & co.? + +.. _`Strauss, Corbin`: + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-8039-5939-7 |