diff options
author | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2017-07-28 22:18:32 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2017-07-28 22:18:32 +0200 |
commit | 8a0675fd1834cfc7dd215d4c55d02d2239b78285 (patch) | |
tree | ee6cb159a38877fe312497d5cce95e0aa53047df /faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst | |
parent | b4d0ddeb6147988c4950d775077b485e766908d7 (diff) | |
download | blog-source-8a0675fd1834cfc7dd215d4c55d02d2239b78285.tar.gz |
Two more articles
Diffstat (limited to 'faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst b/faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e243331 --- /dev/null +++ b/faith/another_one_on_NFP.rst @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +On “A Painfully Familiar Reason for Using NFP” +############################################## + +:date: 2017-07-28 22:06:55 +:category: faith +:tags: culture, sociology, blogComment, sin, Christianity, + marriage, feminism, conscience + +Record of my comment_ to another nice article_ by Melinda Selmys. + +.. _comment: + http://disq.us/p/1kwil7h + +.. _article: + http://www.patheos.com/blogs/catholicauthenticity/2017/07/painfully-familiar-reason-using-nfp/ + +This is one of those sad places where I am afraid my voice will +be completely ignored, because exactly the people who will most +dogmatically insist on NFP will be the ones who will be the least +likely to listen to the idea of this Protestant. Oh well. + +I know that every anti-Crusader will try to beat me down with (a +bit murky, in my opinion) verse 1 Timothy 2:15 “But women will be +saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and +holiness with propriety.” (NIV). I would think that even a woman +is saved through the sacrificed blood of our Lord Jesus Christ +(and yes, the word is the Strong’s 4982, “sozo” which is +elsewhere translated as saved; but I am not a Greek linguist so +I cannot fight this battle for too long). Let me just say that +I don’t see this verse as the most lucid one. + +So, let me suggest that I don’t see it as anything anti-Christian +if a wife after prayers and discussions with her husband decides +that her calling in life is something else than popping out +babies for her whole fertile time. What if she thinks that God +calls her to be a medical doctor, so after having two or three +kids she would rather spend her time helping people get healed? +What if she just decides that God calls her somewhere else than +having babies at all (even though she wants to be married and +have sex with her husband)? Are women never allowed to have +a professional carrier? Also, isn’t it more important have many +children the couple can bring up well to their adulthood than how +many children mother produces in the maternity ward? + +Yes, willingness to accept kids when they come is certainly part +of every Christian marriage (no anti-conception is 100% secure, +especially the less problematic ones are not; and abortion is +IMHO almost never acceptable), but it doesn’t mean the couple’s +will should be just discarded, does it? |