summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/community.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu>2015-09-24 22:47:45 +0200
committerMatěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu>2015-09-24 22:49:48 +0200
commit8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853 (patch)
treee21025360e9c32c5be96bc5640b0c5a29ca92280 /community.rst
parent87b5b78bdab9f174795224f08eadfc8d79eae9ef (diff)
downloadblog-source-8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853.tar.gz
Initial rewrite of posts for pelican
Diffstat (limited to 'community.rst')
-rw-r--r--community.rst89
1 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/community.rst b/community.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..deb874a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/community.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Concept of community?
+#####################
+
+:date: 2005-09-23T23:45:00
+:category: research
+
+First of all, this is what I’ve got from a member of my dissertation
+committee:
+
+ What you propose so far is quite interesting, but I still do not get
+ a clear sense of how you propose to study the Boston Miracle. The
+ theories you review are there for explaining crime, but how you link
+ them to the kind of response that produced the so called Boston
+ Miracle needs to be better delineated. I was disappointed in the
+ methodology. This seems to need considerable work. Your proposal to
+ look at newspaper reports is quite sensible. But that doesn’t go far
+ enough in telling what exactly you’ll be looking for in those
+ reports. You need to expand this section. All I can tell from your
+ proposal is that you wish to study newspaper reports and how they
+ represented minorities during this time of crisis. If so I would
+ think that the data at various points are rather thin. You might
+ want to take a sample of what you think might be out there and code
+ accordingly to make the better case for what you propose to do and
+ how you propose to do it.
+
+ Suggestion:
+
+ Given your interest in bureaucracy and where you were raised why not
+ take a critical and deeper look at the concept of community? It is
+ so often used and yet it has come to mean so many things to say many
+ people. You use it. Others do as well. Community policing, community
+ organization, etc. etc.… You could show how the concept of community
+ has driven the Boston miracle, and how the term community has been
+ used in the media. This I think would allow you to work with a wider
+ set of data and enable you to draw on the Boston miracle as just one
+ example of how community is used as a concept and as a way of
+ explaining social change. You can even divide this literature into
+ that which relates the internal and external attributions of
+ community. For instance, you could suggest that the Boston miracle
+ is empirically related to newspaper attributions that see the change
+ related to internal as opposed to external representations of
+ community. External representations I would say link the community
+ to the broader political economy, while internal representations
+ emphasize the local political economy and the values of those
+ directly involved in the community. External would be foundation
+ support, federal and state economic aid, etc.…
+
+This is a lot. Basically, if I understand this correctly, he suggests to
+throw away most of what I have done so far and begin again. On the other
+hand, there is a part of me agreeing with him—it seems that there really
+may not be that much explicit about the image of the community. I would
+have to interpret even more from the given material—which could lead to
+pretty stupid conclusions (given my lack of local knowledge), or to
+something really interesting and new.
+
+Which leads me again to the necessity of going through fundamental
+conceptual stuff and makes me less certain that I know what I am talking
+about. I mean, is it really possible to find out something that’s really
+going on out there, or do I just write again my superstitions into the
+previously created myth of “The Boston Miracle”? Should I just write how
+wonderful it is when people work together, talk about each other nicely,
+and kill each other less often? All that could be covered into nice
+“scientific” labels of “social capital”, “trust”, or “civic society”?
+
+I am afraid, that after all scientific talking is said and done, it may
+come down to the question which story I am willing to take as a base of
+my own thinking. Unfortunately, there isn’t just one story to be
+told—the one about good pastors raising up the community and empowering
+themselves to fight crime. There is also much more sad story about the
+Ten-point Coallition which is (according to some spoken and unconfirmed
+information) more or less broke, about former co-workers (Rev. Hammond
+and Rev. Rivers) who were bashing each other in public (that was couple
+of years ago—what is the situation now?). The latter story may be really
+about the non-profit organization paid by the federal money which run
+out (was it because its own success and thus less need to prevent crime
+or because of the general economic downturn and need to save federal
+money or maybe even about the cutting down the federal budget?). The
+last possible story which comes to my mind is altogether nasty—about
+white voters supporting government’s support of the anti-crime
+prevention when fearing blacks to kill them (while killing each other),
+but hesitant to continue when the situation has turned better. The last
+two stories have in common that they understand TPC success as a seed of
+its own problems—maybe that is worthy to be investigated.
+
+However, the last story, about fearful voters, can be at least to some
+degree verified, because at least some (indirect, self-censored,
+politically very correct, to be sure) footprints should be possible to
+find in newspapers, if there is at least some level of this discussion
+in the readers’ community (whatever such community means, yes).