diff options
author | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2015-09-24 22:47:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2015-09-24 22:49:48 +0200 |
commit | 8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853 (patch) | |
tree | e21025360e9c32c5be96bc5640b0c5a29ca92280 /community.rst | |
parent | 87b5b78bdab9f174795224f08eadfc8d79eae9ef (diff) | |
download | blog-source-8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853.tar.gz |
Initial rewrite of posts for pelican
Diffstat (limited to 'community.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | community.rst | 89 |
1 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/community.rst b/community.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..deb874a --- /dev/null +++ b/community.rst @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +Concept of community? +##################### + +:date: 2005-09-23T23:45:00 +:category: research + +First of all, this is what I’ve got from a member of my dissertation +committee: + + What you propose so far is quite interesting, but I still do not get + a clear sense of how you propose to study the Boston Miracle. The + theories you review are there for explaining crime, but how you link + them to the kind of response that produced the so called Boston + Miracle needs to be better delineated. I was disappointed in the + methodology. This seems to need considerable work. Your proposal to + look at newspaper reports is quite sensible. But that doesn’t go far + enough in telling what exactly you’ll be looking for in those + reports. You need to expand this section. All I can tell from your + proposal is that you wish to study newspaper reports and how they + represented minorities during this time of crisis. If so I would + think that the data at various points are rather thin. You might + want to take a sample of what you think might be out there and code + accordingly to make the better case for what you propose to do and + how you propose to do it. + + Suggestion: + + Given your interest in bureaucracy and where you were raised why not + take a critical and deeper look at the concept of community? It is + so often used and yet it has come to mean so many things to say many + people. You use it. Others do as well. Community policing, community + organization, etc. etc.… You could show how the concept of community + has driven the Boston miracle, and how the term community has been + used in the media. This I think would allow you to work with a wider + set of data and enable you to draw on the Boston miracle as just one + example of how community is used as a concept and as a way of + explaining social change. You can even divide this literature into + that which relates the internal and external attributions of + community. For instance, you could suggest that the Boston miracle + is empirically related to newspaper attributions that see the change + related to internal as opposed to external representations of + community. External representations I would say link the community + to the broader political economy, while internal representations + emphasize the local political economy and the values of those + directly involved in the community. External would be foundation + support, federal and state economic aid, etc.… + +This is a lot. Basically, if I understand this correctly, he suggests to +throw away most of what I have done so far and begin again. On the other +hand, there is a part of me agreeing with him—it seems that there really +may not be that much explicit about the image of the community. I would +have to interpret even more from the given material—which could lead to +pretty stupid conclusions (given my lack of local knowledge), or to +something really interesting and new. + +Which leads me again to the necessity of going through fundamental +conceptual stuff and makes me less certain that I know what I am talking +about. I mean, is it really possible to find out something that’s really +going on out there, or do I just write again my superstitions into the +previously created myth of “The Boston Miracle”? Should I just write how +wonderful it is when people work together, talk about each other nicely, +and kill each other less often? All that could be covered into nice +“scientific” labels of “social capital”, “trust”, or “civic society”? + +I am afraid, that after all scientific talking is said and done, it may +come down to the question which story I am willing to take as a base of +my own thinking. Unfortunately, there isn’t just one story to be +told—the one about good pastors raising up the community and empowering +themselves to fight crime. There is also much more sad story about the +Ten-point Coallition which is (according to some spoken and unconfirmed +information) more or less broke, about former co-workers (Rev. Hammond +and Rev. Rivers) who were bashing each other in public (that was couple +of years ago—what is the situation now?). The latter story may be really +about the non-profit organization paid by the federal money which run +out (was it because its own success and thus less need to prevent crime +or because of the general economic downturn and need to save federal +money or maybe even about the cutting down the federal budget?). The +last possible story which comes to my mind is altogether nasty—about +white voters supporting government’s support of the anti-crime +prevention when fearing blacks to kill them (while killing each other), +but hesitant to continue when the situation has turned better. The last +two stories have in common that they understand TPC success as a seed of +its own problems—maybe that is worthy to be investigated. + +However, the last story, about fearful voters, can be at least to some +degree verified, because at least some (indirect, self-censored, +politically very correct, to be sure) footprints should be possible to +find in newspapers, if there is at least some level of this discussion +in the readers’ community (whatever such community means, yes). |