diff options
author | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2015-09-24 22:47:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> | 2015-09-24 22:49:48 +0200 |
commit | 8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853 (patch) | |
tree | e21025360e9c32c5be96bc5640b0c5a29ca92280 /andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst | |
parent | 87b5b78bdab9f174795224f08eadfc8d79eae9ef (diff) | |
download | blog-source-8fcd5369775dcb4b825f6728c9df93369539a853.tar.gz |
Initial rewrite of posts for pelican
Diffstat (limited to 'andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst | 75 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst b/andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ba2ae1b --- /dev/null +++ b/andrew_sneckvik_bible.rst @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +Andrew Sneckvik on Bible +######################## + +:date: 2005-07-07T21:07:00 +:category: faith + +Andrew began to talk about misconceptions that discourages us to join in +God’s story: + +Bible is a set of timeless truths. + Unfortunately, takeway from this is that believing Bible won’t + change anything fundamental about the nature of our life. We live in + a timeless vacuum and in the end the only way I’ll know if I + succeeded is to compare myself to these abstract principles of good + living or succes of others. Bible is therefore just a set of + principles, which leads us into our rat race to run slightly faster + than other rats. + + This stress on abstract concepts and theoretical truths is according + to Andrew coming from the Greek philosophy (which was all about + searching for the timeless truths and their application for the + practical life) and it was totally alien to the original Biblical + Hebrew thinking. Unfortuantely, this stress was renewed in the + Reformation (Calvin). Opposition to this trend is postmodern + theology (and some of its precursors, e. g., Jonathan Edwards). + +Old Testament was the first way God tried to relate but it didn’t work. + Takeaway is that we have little to offer that will make a difference + since we are so below standard. + +New Testament is about this free gift that costs us nothing. + OK, this what made Bonhoeffer to write *“The Cost of Discipleship”* + and of course the main takeway from this statement would be that + nothing we do in our lives will significantly impact cosmic history, + so that the only question in our life is that whether we’ve got the + ticket to heaven and the rest of the life doesn’t really matter + (maybe we can give the same ticket to others, but that’s it). + +Early church was perfect embodiment of church + We are part of the ship that is going down. You can try hard to do + things better but good luck. The glory days are over. + +The alternative Andrew has to these statements (and who of us did not +find herself believing at least some of them?) is understanding Bible as +a story, or as a report about part of the story God creates in the +history (from the begining till today and still further until the end). + +Beginning of the story is before the begining of Bible itself—God lives +in perfect unity and harmony within itself (Trinity), but wants to +extend this unity, love, and fellowship with other creatures. So he +creates first angels and then humans. Unfortuantely, angels first misuse +freedom he gave and under the leadership of Lucipher they make revolt +against God so that Lucipher may take some of God’s glory. Then the +Lucipher’s revolt is broken and he is rejected from the heaven to the +earth. Why is then the world as it is and what should we do +here—obviously we should fight and these little us can help the world to +make at least small difference in the war (story of Abram). + +Therefore, what was around the Garden of Eden? Huge wasteland [Ge 2.5] +and the land under the rule of Satan (which is how it happened that a +serpent was around the Garden of Eden). Adam and Eve were not sent to +the Earth to be happy, enjoy each other, and name animals, but as a +paratroopers to the area occupied by the enemy. (Which reminds me of +John Wimber's comment on church: if the church is a ship, then it is not +a cruise ship ready for departure to Carribean, but battleship leaving +for war.) + +*Andrew’s conclusion:* Rather than wanting a people who never make +mistakes we learn that God is looking for weak, fallible people who are +willing to take risks on God to provide for them exclusively. People +experiencing God’s incredible goodness directly through their radical +dependence on Him become unbelievably motivated (using all their +resources) to bring as many others into this same place of radical +dependence on God. Radical dependence leads to experiencing God’s +radical goodness, which leads to involvment in God’s radical purposes. |