| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
whatsoever (for example \fR) and escape sequences that produce
invisible zero-width output (for example \&). No, i'm not joking,
groff does make that distinction, and it has consequences in some
situations, for example for vertical spacing in no-fill mode.
Heirloom and Plan 9 behaviour is subtly different, but in case of
doubt, we want to follow groff.
While this fixes the behaviour for the majority of escape sequences,
in particular for those most likely to occur in practice, it is not
perfect yet because some of the more exotic ESCAPE_IGNORE sequences
are actually of the "no output whatsoever" type but treated
as "invisible zero-width" for now. With the new ASCII_NBRZW mechanism
in place, switching them over one by one when the need arises will
no longer be very difficult.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
causes horrible churn anyway, profit of the opportunity to stop
excessive testing, such that this is hopefully the last instance
of such churn. Consistently use OpenBSD RCS tags, blank .Os,
blank fourth .TH argument, and Mdocdate like everywhere else.
Use -Ios=OpenBSD for platform-independent predictable output.
|
