1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
@Section
@Title { Sorted galleys }
@Tag { sorted }
@Begin
@PP
When footnotes are placed at the bottom of a page, they appear there in
first come, first served order. To make galleys appear in sorted order, as
sorted.galley @Index { Sorted galleys }
is needed in bibliographies and indexes, a parameter or nested definition
with the special name @@Key
key. @Index { @@Key parameter }
is added to the galley definition, like this:
@ID @OneRow @Code {
"def @IndexEntry into { @IndexPlace&&following }"
" left @Key"
" right x"
"{ x }"
}
@@Key must be set to a simple word, or several words with nothing more
complex than font changes within them, when the galley is invoked:
@ID @Code {
"{ cities compare } @IndexEntry { cities, comparison of, 27 }"
}
and this key is used to sort the galleys.
@PP
If several sorted galleys with the same key are sent to the same place,
the default behaviour is to print only the first of them; the assumption
is that the others are probably unwanted duplicates. This holds good
for sorted reference lists, for example: we don't want two copies of
a reference just because we happen to cite it twice.
@PP
The other common example of sorted galleys, index entries, requires
something different from discarding duplicates: @I merged
galleys. Suppose that at some point of the document we insert the index entry
@ID @Code "aardvarks @IndexEntry { Aardvarks, 23 }"
while at another point we insert
@ID @Code "aardvarks @IndexEntry { Aardvarks, 359 }"
How the page numbers are worked out is not relevant here. Clearly we
would like to merge these two entries into one entry that comes out as
@ID "Aardvarks, 23, 359"
The following definition will merge two objects in this way:
@ID @OneRow @Code {
"def @Merge left x right y"
"{"
" {x @Rump y} @Case"
" {"
" \"\" @Yield x"
" else @Yield { x, x @Rump y }"
" }"
"}"
}
The @@Rump symbol is the subject of Section {@NumberOf rump}; this
says `if the two things to be merged are equal, the result is one
of them; otherwise it is the first followed by a comma and space
and then the rump of the second.' Our only problem is that this
symbol has to be applied to two galleys from widely separated
parts of the document.
@PP
Lout makes this possible by the following special rule: if a
sorted galley contains a nested definition of a symbol whose name
is @@Merge (@@Merge must have just two parameters, left and right),
merge. @Index { @@Merge symbol }
and if that sorted galley is preceded in the list of
sorted galleys destined for some target by another sorted galley
with the same key, then rather than being discarded, the second
galley is merged into the first using the @@Merge symbol.
@PP
The natural thing to do when more than two galleys have the same
key is to merge the first two, then merge the third with the
result of that, then the fourth with the result of that, and
so on. For efficiency reasons beyond our scope here, Lout does
the merging in a different order: it merges @Eq { n } galleys
by merging the first @Eq { lfloor n slash 2 rfloor } together,
then the last @Eq { lceil n slash 2 rceil } together, then
merging the result. Of course, if the @@Merge symbol is
associative this has the same effect. The @@Merge symbol above
is not strictly associative, but it is close enough in practice. The
total time it takes to merge @Eq { n } galleys with equal keys
is @Eq { O ( n sup 2 ) } or somewhat higher (but always polynomial
in @Eq { n }) depending on how many times the parameters occur
within the body of @@Merge; to do it in the natural linear order
would take Lout exponential time.
@PP
For horrible reasons concerning making it possible to print reference
lists sorted by point of first citation, the particular sort key
{@Code "??"} is treated differently. If two galleys have this
key, according to the rules above either the second would be
discarded or else it would be merged with the first. However,
for this particular key only, the two galleys will in fact be
kept distinct, just as though their sort keys had been different.
@End @Section
|
