blob: d3f00e75e7d1a3213ea6c37e6d135a2de4029d9d (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
|
Ronny Pfannschmidt <Ronny.Pfannschmidt@gmx.de> writes:
> the basic idea is to take a look at all public branches (for exaple
> all on lp/bitbucket/github) in order to tell the user of a
> webinterface that bug foo is fixed in branch xyz, and if its merged to
> the main branch
I don't understand. The state of the bug in the main branch is right
there in the main branch; if it's not fixed there, it's not fixed there.
If it's merged in from a different branch, the bug state follows all the
other changes when they come in.
Can you give an example of what would be done differently?
--
\ “The basic fact about human existence is not that it is a |
`\ tragedy, but that it is a bore.” —Henry L. Mencken |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
_______________________________________________
Be-devel mailing list
Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org
http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
|
