From e98d951b402f5f61bf0fafc86ae5ad5a03f1c85e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Schwarze Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:10:45 +0000 Subject: Disentangle the MANDOCERR_CHILD message, which reported three completely different things, into three distinct messages. Also mention the macro names we are talking about. --- read.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'read.c') diff --git a/read.c b/read.c index ffb650f3..7908ab22 100644 --- a/read.c +++ b/read.c @@ -120,8 +120,9 @@ static const char * const mandocerrs[MANDOCERR_MAX] = { "moving paragraph macro out of list", "skipping no-space macro", "blocks badly nested", - "child violates parent syntax", "nested displays are not portable", + "moving content out of list", + ".Vt block has child macro", "fill mode already enabled, skipping .fi", "fill mode already disabled, skipping .nf", "line scope broken", @@ -180,6 +181,7 @@ static const char * const mandocerrs[MANDOCERR_MAX] = { "skipping unknown macro", "NOT IMPLEMENTED, please use groff: skipping request", "argument count wrong", + "skipping invalid content in .Rs block", "skipping column outside column list", "skipping end of block that is not open", "missing end of block", -- cgit