Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Correctly calculate required column widths for tables containing | Ingo Schwarze | 2021-09-07 | 1 | -1/+9 |
| | | | | | | | cells that horizontally span columns which contains "n" (number) formatted cells on other rows. This requires updating total column widths from "n" formatted cells before starting width distribution from the spanning cells to their constituent columns. | ||||
* | delete the two pairs of extra blank lines from expected man(7) terminal | Ingo Schwarze | 2021-06-28 | 1 | -4/+0 |
| | | | | output that are no longer printed since man_term.c rev. 1.236 | ||||
* | The GNU tbl(1) program contained in the groff package internally | Ingo Schwarze | 2020-10-25 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | uses roff(7) tabulator settings to implement tables, and it used to leak the changed tabulator settings from tables to the subsequent roff(7) code. In mandoc/tbl_term.c rev. 1.54 (June 17, 2017), code was added to be bug-compatible with groff. In commit d0e03cf6 (Oct 20, 2020), GNU tbl(1) changed behaviour to save the tabulator settings before starting a table and restore them afterwards. Adjust mandoc for compatibility. Since mandoc implements tables without using roff(7) tabulator settings, saving and restoring tabulator settings is not needed in mandoc. Simply deleting the code that changed tabulator settings by reverting tbl_term.c rev. 1.54 is sufficient in mandoc. Also adjust the desired output of the regression tests to match the new behaviour of both groff and mandoc. | ||||
* | style message about missing RCS ids; inspired by mdoclint | Ingo Schwarze | 2017-06-17 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | tables leak tab settings to subsequent text | Ingo Schwarze | 2017-06-17 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| | |||||
* | fix the interaction of the allbox option with spanned cells in the layout | Ingo Schwarze | 2017-06-13 | 1 | -0/+8 |
| | |||||
* | Finally port the OpenBSD regression suite. | Ingo Schwarze | 2017-02-08 | 1 | -0/+33 |
Both kristaps@ and wiz@ repeated asked for this, literally for years. |