summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/regress/mdoc/In/in.in
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Normalise SYNOPSIS behaviour after I gave up on following groff'sKristaps Dzonsons2010-06-071-24/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | inconsistent behaviour. In short: Some macros are displayed differently in the SYNOPSIS section, particularly Nm, Cd, Fd, Fn, Fo, In, Vt, and Ft. All of these macros are output on their own line. If two such dissimilar macros are pair-wise invoked (except for Ft before Fo or Fn), they are separated by a vertical space, unless in the case of Fo, Fn, and Ft, which are always separated by vertical space. Behaviour ok Jason McIntyre, ingo@. Fallout will be treated case-by-case. I had to clear out some regressions that were testing against groff's stranger behaviours: these will now break, as we don't care about such invocations. Also removed the newline for `Cd' invocation in a non-SYNOPSIS context.
* Documented `In' in full.Kristaps Dzonsons2010-06-041-0/+24
Fixed `In' to behave properly: it wasn't properly breaking lines, formatting, or really anything else. Noted COMPATIBILITY with OpenBSD's groff, which pukes all over `In'.