| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and of called macros.
This bug affects almost all macros, and fixing it simplifies the
code. It is amazing that the bogus ARGS_QWORD feature got implemented
in the first place, and then carrier along for more than eight years
without anybody ever noticing that it was pointless.
Reported by Leah Neukirchen <leah at vuxu dot org>, found on Void Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
input files in -T markdown output mode by default and only mark
those files with SKIP_MARKDOWN that are not to be tested.
Much easier to read, and almost minus 40 lines of Makefile code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both kristaps@ and wiz@ repeated asked for this,
literally for years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It has not been used or maintained for several years,
and we won't start using it now.
Devlopment regression testing is done in OpenBSD, and
there is no value in maintaining two regression suites in parallel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sure where this came about. Added regression tests to convince myself
that this is so. Also consolidated COMPATIBILITY notes regarding `Bd'.
Added COMPATIBILITY note to the effect that old groff pukes on `Bd
-compact -ragged' (regression test will fail on old groff).
|
|
inconsistent behaviour. In short:
Some macros are displayed differently in the SYNOPSIS
section, particularly Nm, Cd, Fd, Fn, Fo, In, Vt, and Ft.
All of these macros are output on their own line. If two
such dissimilar macros are pair-wise invoked (except for Ft
before Fo or Fn), they are separated by a vertical space,
unless in the case of Fo, Fn, and Ft, which are always
separated by vertical space.
Behaviour ok Jason McIntyre, ingo@. Fallout will be treated
case-by-case.
I had to clear out some regressions that were testing against groff's
stranger behaviours: these will now break, as we don't care about such
invocations.
Also removed the newline for `Cd' invocation in a non-SYNOPSIS context.
|