Lout 3.23.

git-svn-id: http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/svn/lout/trunk@15 9365b830-b601-4143-9ba8-b4a8e2c3339c

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/doc/user/str_indx b/doc/user/str_indx
index 3c15c09..b75c8db 100644
--- a/doc/user/str_indx
+++ b/doc/user/str_indx
@@ -40,14 +40,15 @@ automatically.
 The object preceding the @Code "@Index" symbol is a compulsory key
 which is used for sorting the index entries,
 @FootNote {
-The collating sequence used to decide what comes after what is the
-collating sequence used by the @Code "memcmp()" library routine (just
-the underlying binary character codes).  Alternatively, the version
-of Lout installed on your system may use the @Code "strcoll()"
-collating sequence, which understands accented characters and whose
-effect depends on your locale.  To find out whether @Code "strcoll()"
-is in use or not, type @Code "lout -V" which prints out several lines
-of this and similar information.
+The collating sequence used to decide what comes after what is either
+the collating sequence used by the @Code "memcmp()" library routine (just
+the underlying binary character codes), or else the one used by the
+@Code "strcoll()" collating sequence, which understands accented
+characters and whose effect depends on your locale.  To find out
+whether @Code "strcoll()" is in use or not, type @Code "lout -V" which
+prints out several lines of this and similar information, including
+information about command line flags to switch between the two kinds of
+collation.
 @PP
 If the sorting you get turns out to be not what you expected, the
 first thing to try is the replacement of all accented letters in index
@@ -55,10 +56,10 @@ keys by unaccented ones.  Sorting is quite an intractable problem:  even
 if @Code "strcoll()" gets the sorting right for one language, there still
 remains the problem of sorting multilingual indexes.
 @PP
-Lout's database mechanism assumes that the @I tab character is collated
-before any character that could appear in a sorting key.  It seems that
-there are a few collating sequences in existence which do not satisfy this
-condition, and in these cases Lout will fail to produce the correct index.
+Older versions of Lout assumed that the @I tab character was collated
+before any character that could appear in a sorting key, causing
+problems when this was not so.  Recent versions of Lout no longer
+make this assumption.
 }
 but which is not itself printed anywhere.  It is best to construct these
 sorting keys from lower-case letters and the . character only, beginning