aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/expert/det_prec
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeffrey H. Kingston <jeff@it.usyd.edu.au>2010-09-14 19:21:41 +0000
committerJeffrey H. Kingston <jeff@it.usyd.edu.au>2010-09-14 19:21:41 +0000
commit71bdb35d52747e6d7d9f55df4524d57c2966be94 (patch)
tree480ee5eefccc40d5f3331cc52d66f722fd19bfb9 /doc/expert/det_prec
parentb41263ea7578fa9742486135c762803b52794105 (diff)
downloadlout-71bdb35d52747e6d7d9f55df4524d57c2966be94.tar.gz
Lout 3.17.
git-svn-id: http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/svn/lout/trunk@2 9365b830-b601-4143-9ba8-b4a8e2c3339c
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/expert/det_prec')
-rw-r--r--doc/expert/det_prec103
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/expert/det_prec b/doc/expert/det_prec
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c2dd72d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/expert/det_prec
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+@Section
+ @Title { Precedence and associativity of symbols }
+ @Tag { precedence }
+@Begin
+@PP
+Every symbol in Lout has a {@I precedence},
+preceden @Index { Precedence }
+which is a positive whole number. When two symbols compete for an object,
+the one with the higher precedence wins it. For example,
+@ID @Code {
+"a | b / c"
+}
+is equivalent to @OneCol @Code { "{" a "|" b "}" "/" c } rather than
+{@OneCol @Code { a "|" "{" b "/" c "}"} }, because @Code "|" has higher
+precedence than @Code "/" and thus wins the {@Code b}.
+@PP
+When the two competing symbols have equal precedence, Lout applies a
+second rule. Each symbol is either @I left-associative or
+associativity @Index { Associativity }
+{@I right-associative}. The value of @OneCol @Code { a op1 b op2 c} is taken
+to be @OneCol @Code { "{" a op1 b "}" op2 c } if the symbols are both
+left-associative, and @OneCol @Code "a op1 { b op2 c }" if they are
+right-associative. In cases not covered by these two rules, use braces.
+@PP
+It sometimes happens that the result is the same regardless of how the
+expression is grouped. For example, @OneCol @Code { "{" a "|" b "}" "|" c }
+and @OneCol @Code { a "|" "{" b "|" c "}" } are always the same, for any
+combination of objects, gaps, and variants of {@Code "|"}. In such cases
+the symbols are said to be {@I associative}, and we can confidently omit
+the braces.
+@PP
+User-defined symbols may be given a precedence and associativity:
+@ID @OneRow @Code {
+"def @Super"
+" precedence 50"
+" associativity right"
+" left x"
+" right y"
+"{"
+" @OneRow { | -2p @Font y ^/0.5fk x }"
+"}"
+}
+They come just after any @Code into clause and before any parameter
+definitions. The precedence may be
+any whole number between 10 and 100, and if omitted is assigned the
+value 100. The higher the number, the higher the precedence. The
+associativity may be @Code left or {@Code right}, and if omitted
+defaults to {@Code right}. Lout's symbols have the following
+precedences and associativities:
+@ID @Tab
+ vmargin { 0.5vx }
+ @Fmta { @Col @CC A ! @Col @CC B ! @Col C }
+{
+@Rowa
+ A { Precedence }
+ B { Associativity }
+ C { Symbols }
+@Rowa
+@Rowa
+ A { 5 }
+ B { associative }
+ C { @Code "/ ^/ // ^//" }
+@Rowa
+ A { 6 }
+ B { associative }
+ C { @Code "| ^| || ^||" }
+@Rowa
+ A { 7 }
+ B { associative }
+ C { @Code "& ^&" }
+@Rowa
+ A { 7 }
+ B { associative }
+ C { @Code "&" in the form of one or more white space characters }
+@Rowa
+ A { 10-100 }
+ B { @Code left or @Code right }
+ C { user-defined symbols }
+@Rowa
+ A { 100 }
+ B { @Code right }
+ C { @@Wide, @@High, @@Graphic, etc. }
+@Rowa
+ A { 101 }
+ B { - }
+ C { @Code "&&" }
+@Rowa
+ A { 102 }
+ B { associative }
+ C { @Code "&" in the form of 0 spaces }
+@Rowa
+ A { 103 }
+ B { - }
+ C { Body parameters and right parameters of @@Open }
+}
+Actually the precedence of juxtaposition (two objects separated
+by zero spaces) is a little more complicated. If either of the
+two objects is enclosed in braces, the precedence is 7 as for
+one or more spaces. If neither object is enclosed in braces,
+the precedence is 102 as shown above. This complicated rule
+seems to accord better with what people expect and need in
+practice than a pure precedence rule can do.
+@End @Section