On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:19:35AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Instead of a separate command for each output format, could we have a
> single "produce a static report of the bug database" command, and
> specify output format as an option?
> 
> How about:
> 
>     be report
>     be report --format ascii
>     be report --format rst
>     be report --format html

Do people like this architecture better than my be-xml-to-mbox
approach?  I think the tradeoff is easy output format implementation
vs cluttered core codebase.  Should we use both, depending on how
useful people think the output format will be?

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'.
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt