From 274725245f069882af2a62c49382353043bb9caf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:01:57 -0400 Subject: bea/c283cb: merge earlier hosting-integration emails onto gitorious-issues bug. --- .../e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/body | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/values | 14 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/body create mode 100644 .be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/values (limited to '.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2') diff --git a/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/body b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b60161d --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/body @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +On 19 March 2010 08:02, Chris Ball wrote: + +> I've noticed that github.com and bitbucket.org offer bugtracking, but +> gitorious.org doesn't. What do you think about attempting to work on +> a bugtracker interface for a free code hosting site using BE as the +> backend? An awful lot of people (me included, occasionally!) are +> using proprietary sites like github and entrusting their bugtracking +> data to it; having a public hosting service that doesn't create a +> dependency on that service for your bugtracking data would be pretty +> compelling, I think. +> + +I've been playing with BE a bit and lurking on this list. I'm a Bitbucket +user, and I like that each project can have source, wiki and bugtracking +associated with it. Now source and wiki are two different plain mercurial +repos. Bugtracking though, has no way to export or import. This is a shame, +since important data is now locked into the site, which ultimately prevents +competition. + +I'd be keen for an open source web interface which serves the holy trinity +(source, wiki, bugs) and allows both private and public projects, as the +proprietary sites do. BE seems a natural fit for the bugs component of a +site like this. + +Lars diff --git a/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/values b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/values new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4927bf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/c283cbb1-2964-4372-9d9c-117dd3a85518/comments/e7f9d1d5-070b-4d9b-9c86-bb5754d8cbd2/values @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +Alt-id: <313fdf961003181430g5b672702h8da2f68d31ea9b0a@mail.gmail.com> + + +Author: Lars Yencken + + +Content-type: text/plain + + +Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:30:59 +0000 + + +In-reply-to: + -- cgit