From 148379492d314c0eb98ee8559aea7a2fd0baaeb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:59:52 -0500 Subject: Clearer UnicodeDecodeError message in command_line.dispatch(). See #bea/e30# ("Where should the vcs-name and encoding configuration options live?") for details. --- .../e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/body | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/values | 11 ++++++ 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/body create mode 100644 .be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/values (limited to '.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments') diff --git a/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/body b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b6a0435 --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/body @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +> It would be nice if we could store tests. +> .be/BUGDIR/tests/... +> and link them from bugs. + +Better: have them be comments with a TEST tag. + +The mime type could hint at the execution mechanism: + text/x-python + application/x-sh + ... + +> Then running +> test.py BUGDIR/BUG +> would run the tests for that particular bug. +> +> This would provide regression testing via +> test.py $(be list --ids --status fixed) + +This should be a 'test' command (libbe.command.test.Test), since +people will want to test bugs for their own projects, and out current +test.py is for testing BE specifically. It should be + be test BUGDIR/BUG + be test $(be list --ids --status fixed) + +We _should_ add be + test $(be list --ids --status fixed) +to test.py for regression testing. + +This whole thing would make the fixed/closed distinction more clear, +since fixed bugs would get tests run and expect success, while closed +bugs' tests would be skipped. + +Finally, if users are submitting tests on their own, it would be a +good idea to sandbox them, but a portable way for sandboxing scripts +sounds very complicated. It would probably be easier to sandbox +python scripts, but I don't know what that would look like... + +A work around would be to allow users to post tests, but not allow +them to set the TEST flag. Then the bugdir maintainer could set the +flag themselves once they'd vetted the test. Much uglier than +sandboxing, but also much more easily implemented. + diff --git a/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/values b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/values new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3ddceba --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bea86499-824e-4e77-b085-2d581fa9ccab/bugs/3438b72c-6244-4f1d-8722-8c8d41484e35/comments/e7d8343a-bd85-4359-bcda-bf0dc1e8177a/values @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +Author: W. Trevor King + + +Content-type: text/plain + + +Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:36:52 +0000 + + +In-reply-to: ba96f1c0-ba48-4df8-aaf0-4e3a3144fc46 + -- cgit