| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This involved an `upgrade' of BE's bzr repo
Previous version (via `bzr info path/to/repo`): pack-0.92
Current version: rich-root-pack
The whole rich-root thing is a bzr features-vs-backwards-compatability
thing they've been wrestling with [1,2,3,4,...]. It seems that BE was
in some sort of unstable equilibrium [5], so I'll follow Ben's lead
and make the official switch. Note that you'll need to use bzr>=1.5
to make the shift [6]. For the sake of completeness, the whole
rich-root thing was introduced here [7], but I don't understand enough
of bzr to make sense of the diff. It just versions the repo's root
directory the same way it versions other directories [3]. The bzr
people seem to be planning to phase out non-rich-root formats in favor
of brisbane-core, aka 2.0beta [8], by bzr 2.0 [8], which is apparently
on the horizon [9,10,11]. What a headache.
Citations are all titles/X-List-Received-Date from
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/
with the exception of the URL [11].
[1] [RFC] rich root pack as default in 1.8 ?
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:33:46 -0000
(conclusion: none)
[2] Re: 1.9rc1 countdown
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:44:53 -0000
(conclusion: "primary" format should be rich-root next time we make a new format)
[3] So many repo formats
Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:41:33 -0000
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:37:47 -0000 (explains rich-root format)
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:37:39 -0000 (explains no-return policy)
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:57:08 -0000 (explicitly lists non-svn reasons for rich-root)
[4] Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo.
Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:31:11 -0000
(we're not sure again)
[5] Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo.
Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:58:09 -0000
[6] Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo.
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:23:52 -0000
[7] [RFC] Knit format 2
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:55:36 -0000
[8] bazaar 2.0beta format for launchpad release
Fri, 29 May 2009 06:00:03 -0000
[9] Upgrading loggerhead to 1.9-rich-root
Mon, 11 May 2009 22:35:28 -0000
(mentions eventual switch to rich-root in 2.0)
[10] bzr 1.16rc1 released!
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:00:08 -0000
(confirms eventual switch to rich-root in 2.0)
[11] https://launchpad.net/bzr/+announcement/2733
(current outstanding releases: 1.17, 2.0)
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I borrowed most of the code for this.
get_encoding() is from Trac
http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/util/datefmt.py
format_datetime()
Trac has a BSD license
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLicense
I don't know if such a small snippet requires us to "reproduce the
above copyright" or where we need to reproduce it if it is needed.
The stdout/stdin replacement code follows
http://wiki.python.org/moin/ShellRedirectionFails
Because of the stdout replacement, the doctests executes now need an
optional 'test' argument to turn off replacement during the doctests,
otherwise doctest flips out (since it had set up stdout to catch
output, and then we clobbered it's setup).
References:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Unicode
http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/unicode
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0100/
I also split libbe/editor.py off from libbe.utility.py and started
explaining the motivation for the BugDir init flags in it's docstring.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lots of changes and just one commit. This started with bug
dac91856-cb6a-4f69-8c03-38ff0b29aab2, when I noticed that new bugs
were not being added appropriately with the Git backend. I'd been
working with Git trouble before with bug
0cad2ac6-76ef-4a88-abdf-b2e02de76f5c, and decided things would be
better off if I just scrapped the current RCS architecture and went to
a more object oriented setup. So I did. It's not clear how to add
support for an RCS backend:
* Create a new module that
- defines an inheritor of rsc.RCS, overriding the _rcs_*() methods
- provide a new() function for instantizating the new class
- defines an inheritor of rcs.RCStestCase, overiding the Class attribute
- defines 'suite' a unittest.TestSuite testing the module
* Add your new module to the rest in rcs._get_matching_rcs()
* Add your new module to the rest in libbe/tests.py
Although I'm not sure libbe/tests.py is still usefull.
The new framework clears out a bunch of hackery that used to be
involved with supporting becommands/diff.py. There's still room for
progress though. While implementing the new verision, I moved the
testing framework over from doctest to a doctest/unittest combination.
Longer tests that don't demonstrate a function's usage should be moved
to unittests at the end of the module, since unittest has better
support for setup/teardown, etc.
The new framework also revealed some underimplented backends, most
notably arch. These backends have now been fixed.
I also tweaked the test_usage.sh script to run through all the backends
if it is called with no arguments.
The fix for the dac bug turned out to be an unflushed file write :p.
|
