diff options
Diffstat (limited to '.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/da97e18f-33d6-469e-9d93-6457b9a6bfca/body')
| -rw-r--r-- | .be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/da97e18f-33d6-469e-9d93-6457b9a6bfca/body | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/da97e18f-33d6-469e-9d93-6457b9a6bfca/body b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/da97e18f-33d6-469e-9d93-6457b9a6bfca/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..27dca1e --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/da97e18f-33d6-469e-9d93-6457b9a6bfca/body @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +On Saturday 04 July 2009 02:31:26 Chris Ball wrote: +> Hi Gianluca, +> +> > As i said in a previous mail, I am working on a "html" command +> > for be. The goal is to be able to do something like "be html +> > /web/page" to have in the /web/page directory some static html +> > pages that basically are the dump of the be repository, much like +> > ditz have. This will enable a simple and fast publish of the bus +> > list and details on the web, at least in read only mode. +> +> It might be a good idea for "be html" to use the CherryPy web interface +> that Steve is working on. The command could start up the CherryPy app +> and scrape all of the available pages to get a stand-alone dump; this +> would avoid having to keep two (okay, more than two at this point) +> separate sets of HTML templates in the source tree. What do you think? + +It can be do, but this implies that CherryPy must be installed and configured, +a thing that I don't want to impose. My idea is to offer a simpler way to have +some html pages, where you just need to have BE installed. + +My very first implementation was a script that parse directly the .be directory +to build the pages, without BE itself installed. + + +> > 2) I see that every command is implemented with a python file in +> > the becommand dir. For a better code, I'd like to split the +> > command implementation into two files: a file that contain the +> > actual code and a second file that have the html related part, +> > any problem with this ? I don't like to have the html part and +> > the code part in one big and unreadable file. +> +> I agree that becommands/*.py commands should not contain any HTML +> layout code. Putting it somewhere else instead sounds fine. + +I am in doubt with the "somewhere else", since for now I put the html template +into a separate file in the same directory. Suggestion ? + +thanks +bye +Gianluca + +_______________________________________________ +Be-devel mailing list +Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org +http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel |