I imported a few threads from the mailing list as wishlist bugs.

12c:uw: Bug aggregation.  Multi-repo meta-BE?
529:ow: How should we version BE?
2f0:aw: Static html report generation
22b:aw: Sorting targets chronologically
d99:aw: CherryPy interface "Cherry-flavored BE"
e08:aw: Interactive email interface

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/.be/bugs/529c290e-b1cf-4800-be7e-68f1ecb9565c/comments/cdf15bdd-d3fe-4251-9d0b-f1b687e9a26c/body b/.be/bugs/529c290e-b1cf-4800-be7e-68f1ecb9565c/comments/cdf15bdd-d3fe-4251-9d0b-f1b687e9a26c/body
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e8445a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.be/bugs/529c290e-b1cf-4800-be7e-68f1ecb9565c/comments/cdf15bdd-d3fe-4251-9d0b-f1b687e9a26c/body
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Currently setup.py sets the version number for BE to 0.0.193 and the
+url to http://panoramicfeedback.com/opensource/.  These are both a bit
+outdated ;).  I've switched my branch over to the current url, and
+moved to last-commit-timestamp version numbers.  This removes the
+"prefered branch" issues with the old scheme, and version numbers
+should increase monotonically, but it looses any stability information
+suggested by the preceding 0.0.
+
+We can add those back in if people want.  Does the first 0 mean
+"interfaces in flux" and the second 0 mean "lots of bugs"?  If so, I
+think we're up to 0.1, since the major features are pretty calm.
+
+-- 
+This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
+The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'.
+For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
+
+My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt