diff options
| author | Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> | 2009-07-23 17:49:13 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> | 2009-07-23 17:49:13 -0400 |
| commit | 6a639574fa95e50f82fa3052e5524b961295a7ab (patch) | |
| tree | b498654ed1dcbdbba94605292c280c883c5e9faa /.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body | |
| parent | 5e249abfee7273c79640c4211607a6b4bf7b374c (diff) | |
| parent | caf0111d9c571ac268c235880e6d18fa512e9efa (diff) | |
| download | bugseverywhere-6a639574fa95e50f82fa3052e5524b961295a7ab.tar.gz | |
Merge large rework from W. Trevor King.
Diffstat (limited to '.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body')
| -rw-r--r-- | .be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body | 47 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2301eba --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/8c1c4f38-a8d4-4cf9-a9f0-e9846ebbcad8/body @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +On Saturday 04 July 2009 02:19:35 Ben Finney wrote: +> Gianluca Montecchi <gian@grys.it> writes: + +> +> > I am open to suggestion about it of course. +> +> Instead of a separate command for each output format, could we have a +> single “produce a static report of the bug database” command, and +> specify output format as an option? +> +> How about: +> +> be report +> be report --format ascii +> be report --format rst +> be report --format html +> +> Where the ‘--format’ option has a default of, e.g., “ascii”. +> +> This would mean that you are implementing the ‘html’ format of this +> putative command. +> + +This sound like an interesting idea, but what i'd like to do is not, strictly +speaking, a report. It is a full tree of html pages that are browseable, both +on line and offline + +> > 2) I see that every command is implemented with a python file in the +> > becommand dir. For a better code, I'd like to split the command +> > implementation into two files: a file that contain the actual code and +> > a second file that have the html related part, any problem with this ? +> +> This sounds quite sensible to me. The existence of a command implies a +> module of the same name in ‘becommand’, but there's no necessary +> implication that that module can't import modules from elsewhere to do +> its work. + +The "elsewhere" for now is the same directory, just another module + +bye +Gianluca + + +_______________________________________________ +Be-devel mailing list +Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org +http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel |