diff options
author | gian <gian@li82-39> | 2009-10-21 14:51:06 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | gian <gian@li82-39> | 2009-10-21 14:51:06 +0200 |
commit | 2e235351d68715d0b232d48c21974ef6a89bb685 (patch) | |
tree | c80ae73263199f46daf6d4fda5b8e8c451fbda1a /.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body | |
parent | 85ab0b48299435a5ecfa6f93af95948d432e096a (diff) | |
parent | c80312557917015fcda9f7baa9e1acdce8ad9de7 (diff) | |
download | bugseverywhere-2e235351d68715d0b232d48c21974ef6a89bb685.tar.gz |
test for bzr merge
Diffstat (limited to '.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body')
-rw-r--r-- | .be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body | 47 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dbf3b1b --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bugs/2f048ac5-5564-4b34-b7f9-605357267ed2/comments/1dba8196-654b-4ca0-9a95-fb334af81863/body @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +Gianluca Montecchi <gian@grys.it> writes: + +> 1) is it ok to develop this command ? I know that this is not a fully +> featured web interface, but I am sure that it can be usefull. + +Yes, definitely. I can see it being a very easy way to put one's bug +database online for browsing. + +> I am open to suggestion about it of course. + +Instead of a separate command for each output format, could we have a +single “produce a static report of the bug database” command, and +specify output format as an option? + +How about: + + be report + be report --format ascii + be report --format rst + be report --format html + +Where the ‘--format’ option has a default of, e.g., “ascii”. + +This would mean that you are implementing the ‘html’ format of this +putative command. + +> 2) I see that every command is implemented with a python file in the +> becommand dir. For a better code, I'd like to split the command +> implementation into two files: a file that contain the actual code and +> a second file that have the html related part, any problem with this ? + +This sounds quite sensible to me. The existence of a command implies a +module of the same name in ‘becommand’, but there's no necessary +implication that that module can't import modules from elsewhere to do +its work. + +-- + \ “It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in | + `\ trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so.” —Artemus Ward | +_o__) (1834–1867), U.S. journalist | +Ben Finney + + +_______________________________________________ +Be-devel mailing list +Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org +http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel |