diff options
author | W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu> | 2009-07-21 16:33:28 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu> | 2009-07-21 16:33:28 -0400 |
commit | 885b04b50ad3bbde81ec2eccfbfb2e516d0d3a80 (patch) | |
tree | 794458babd1aa824b3e343291f6c5f2d7704f27f /.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body | |
parent | 19fc927cf959005a71813ca702fc6c1aa28d3a92 (diff) | |
parent | 86d74730ded314d960e0465f2eb50e5fb66c4767 (diff) | |
download | bugseverywhere-885b04b50ad3bbde81ec2eccfbfb2e516d0d3a80.tar.gz |
Merged assorted changes from be.wtk-rr for BugDir.extra_strings.
Other highlights:
* be show --no-comments
* Improved *.sync_with_disk.
* Improved be-mbox-to-xml.
Diffstat (limited to '.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body')
-rw-r--r-- | .be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body | 47 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body b/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c799630 --- /dev/null +++ b/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +On Sunday 19 July 2009 00:00:46 Chris Ball wrote: +> Hi, +> +> > For example, let's assume we have target a, b, c There is a way +> > to know that "a" is a past target, "b" is the current target and +> > "c" is a future target ? +> +> We could add a "date due" field for each target. + +Good idea + +> > More: there is a way to know if a target is closed or open ? +> +> We could add a "target close" operation that moves all open bugs +> assigned to one target to the next date-due target. + +Nice. But instead of moving all bugs to the next date-due target, I'd prefer +to leave the choice to the user + + +> I see problems with these ideas in general, because we're assuming +> agreement by all parties/branches on when a target's date due is. +> Maybe it's okay to demand that social conventions be used to handle +> such a disagreement, or maybe not. + +I don't see these as problems per se. We can have two cases: + +1) a personal branch (like my html output or Trevor's email interface). In +this case there is not any problem to decide the due date + +2) a branch with a group of delopers (let it be the canonical branch o an +experimental branch): in this case I suppose that working together means to be +able to agree on some things + +In any case, having the possibility to set a due date does not means that it +is obligatory to do it and should be a good idea to offer as many possibilities +as we can to the users of BE + +bye +Gianluca + + + +_______________________________________________ +Be-devel mailing list +Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org +http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel |