aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorW. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>2009-07-21 16:33:28 -0400
committerW. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>2009-07-21 16:33:28 -0400
commit885b04b50ad3bbde81ec2eccfbfb2e516d0d3a80 (patch)
tree794458babd1aa824b3e343291f6c5f2d7704f27f /.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body
parent19fc927cf959005a71813ca702fc6c1aa28d3a92 (diff)
parent86d74730ded314d960e0465f2eb50e5fb66c4767 (diff)
downloadbugseverywhere-885b04b50ad3bbde81ec2eccfbfb2e516d0d3a80.tar.gz
Merged assorted changes from be.wtk-rr for BugDir.extra_strings.
Other highlights: * be show --no-comments * Improved *.sync_with_disk. * Improved be-mbox-to-xml.
Diffstat (limited to '.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body')
-rw-r--r--.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body47
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body b/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c799630
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.be/bugs/22b6f620-d2f7-42a5-a02e-145733a4e366/comments/4952e1c7-e035-42f1-882b-6b5264481d0a/body
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+On Sunday 19 July 2009 00:00:46 Chris Ball wrote:
+> Hi,
+>
+> > For example, let's assume we have target a, b, c There is a way
+> > to know that "a" is a past target, "b" is the current target and
+> > "c" is a future target ?
+>
+> We could add a "date due" field for each target.
+
+Good idea
+
+> > More: there is a way to know if a target is closed or open ?
+>
+> We could add a "target close" operation that moves all open bugs
+> assigned to one target to the next date-due target.
+
+Nice. But instead of moving all bugs to the next date-due target, I'd prefer
+to leave the choice to the user
+
+
+> I see problems with these ideas in general, because we're assuming
+> agreement by all parties/branches on when a target's date due is.
+> Maybe it's okay to demand that social conventions be used to handle
+> such a disagreement, or maybe not.
+
+I don't see these as problems per se. We can have two cases:
+
+1) a personal branch (like my html output or Trevor's email interface). In
+this case there is not any problem to decide the due date
+
+2) a branch with a group of delopers (let it be the canonical branch o an
+experimental branch): in this case I suppose that working together means to be
+able to agree on some things
+
+In any case, having the possibility to set a due date does not means that it
+is obligatory to do it and should be a good idea to offer as many possibilities
+as we can to the users of BE
+
+bye
+Gianluca
+
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+Be-devel mailing list
+Be-devel@bugseverywhere.org
+http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel